Evidence of Uniform Inefficiency in Market Portfolios Based on Dominance Tests
基于占优检验的市场投资组合一致无效率证据AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究投资组合相对基准的随机占优与效率检验,并以效用函数评价组合,直接对应资产定价中的组合效率问题。
基于占优检验的市场投资组合一致无效率证据AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We find stochastic uniform inefficiency of many widely held (active) portfolios and fund strategies relative to popular benchmarks. Uniformity provides robust findings over general classes of utility (loss) functions and unknown distribution of returns. Evidence is based on statistical tests for the null of stochastic uniform inefficiency of a given portfolio. The alternative is that there is at least one portfolio that dominates it. We derive an analytical characterization of stochastic uniform inefficiency. We give the limit distribution for the empirical test statistic, and present a practical implementation with block bootstrap for consistent estimation of p-values. Our test is asymptotically exact and performs well in Monte Carlo experiments.