跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确采用分位数回归与反事实收入分布,并利用纵向劳动收入记录研究长期结果。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kevin L. McKinney
John M. Abowd
Hubert P. Janicki

按性别、种族、族裔与出生地划分的美国长期劳动收入结果

研究问题
美国劳动收入不平等、波动与群体长期差距如何变化,劳动供给和其他特征差异及其回报差异各自解释哪些分布位置?
方法与思路
作者使用 LEHD 纵向数据生成统一收入统计,估计特定队列的十二年平均收入,并用分位数回归构造群体反事实分布。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要报告收入不平等上升、波动下降;劳动供给解释均值层面近九成收入变异,分布底部与中位数以上的差距构成不同。
阅读关注点
应核对样本资格与队列选择、收入及劳动供给口径、十二年平均的构造,以及反事实分解与回报差异的解释条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,这些比例与趋势属于作者报告;分解不能自动解释为因果效应,误差范围和稳健性未说明。

原文摘要

This paper is part of the Global Repository of Income Dynamics (GRID) project cross‐country comparison of earnings inequality, volatility, and mobility. Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer‐Household Dynamics (LEHD) infrastructure files, we produce a uniform set of earnings statistics for the U.S. From 1998 to 2019, we find U.S. earnings inequality has increased and volatility has decreased. The combination of increased inequality and reduced volatility suggest earnings growth differs substantially across different demographic groups. We explore this further by estimating 12‐year average earnings for a single cohort of age 25–54 eligible workers. Overall, differences in labor supply (hours paid and quarters worked) are found to explain almost 90% of the variation in worker earnings at the mean, although substantial earnings differences across and within groups remain unexplained. Using a quantile regression approach, we estimate counterfactual earnings distributions for each demographic group. We find that at the bottom of the earnings distribution differences in characteristics such as hours paid, geographic division, industry, and education explain almost the entire earnings gap; however, above the median the contribution of the differences in the returns to characteristics is the dominant component.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文