跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究含个体固定效应的动态面板估计与自助推断,因此归入面板数据;未提供特定宏观应用依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Sílvia Gonçalves
Maximilien Kaffo

个体固定效应线性动态面板模型的自助法推断

研究问题
在含个体固定效应的自回归面板中,如何改善有限样本置信区间,并使自助分布反映固定效应估计的附带参数偏差?
方法与思路
作者比较递归设计残差自助法、固定设计残差自助法与成对自助法,分析其对原始及偏差校正估计量的适用性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称递归残差自助法能够模拟附带参数偏差及估计分布;用于偏差校正估计量时,递归法和成对法渐近有效。
阅读关注点
应核对面板维度的渐近关系、误差与初值条件、递归生成机制,以及偏差校正如何影响各自助法的有效性。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法确定完整正则条件或区间失真的数值幅度;模拟中的整体优势不能外推至所有面板设计。

原文摘要

This paper’s main contribution is to propose and theoretically justify the application of bootstrap methods for inference in autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. Whereas the focus of the existing literature has been on bias correcting the standard fixed effects OLS estimator (due to the well known incidental parameter bias), our focus here is on improving the quality of inference by relying on the bootstrap instead of the standard normal distribution when computing critical values for test statistics. In particular, we show by simulation that confidence intervals based on the normal distribution can be very distorted in finite samples. Instead, a bootstrap that resamples the residuals and generates the bootstrap observations recursively using the estimated autoregressive panel data model greatly reduces these distortions. We show that this recursive-design residual-based bootstrap fixed effects OLS estimator contains a built-in bias correction term that mimics the incidental parameter bias. Thus, this method can be used to approximate the bias (as well as the entire distribution) of the (biased) fixed effects OLS estimator. This is in contrast with two other methods we consider (a fixed-design residual-based bootstrap and a pairs bootstrap) whose distributions are incorrectly centered at zero. As it turns out, both the recursive-design and the pairs bootstrap are asymptotically valid when applied to the bias-corrected estimator, but the fixed-design bootstrap is not. In the simulations, the recursive-design bootstrap is the method that does best overall.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文