跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究样本选择与厚尾误差,但未明确涉及结构行为模型、因果目标或分布效应等所列细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yulia V. Marchenko
Marc G. Genton

Heckman样本选择t模型

研究问题
当结果仅部分可观测且误差具有厚尾时,如何降低传统正态样本选择模型对分布假设的敏感性并检验选择偏差?
方法与思路
作者连接样本选择模型与扩展偏椭圆分布,采用 Student t 误差提出选择模型,研究极大似然估计及选择偏差检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称门诊支出应用中 t 模型检出选择偏差而正态模型未检出,并指出所比较的正态模型检验在厚尾数据下可能误导。
阅读关注点
应核对选择方程与结果方程的联合分布、识别所需的信息、自由度估计,以及选择偏差检验在厚尾下的水平与功效。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;不能推断刊本变化。摘要未说明具体识别条件;应用差异不构成 t 模型普遍更优的证据。

原文摘要

Sample selection arises often in practice as a result of the partial observability of the outcome of interest in a study. In the presence of sample selection, the observed data do not represent a random sample from the population, even after controlling for explanatory variables. That is, data are missing not at random. Thus, standard analysis using only complete cases will lead to biased results. Heckman introduced a sample selection model to analyze such data and proposed a full maximum likelihood estimation method under the assumption of normality. The method was criticized in the literature because of its sensitivity to the normality assumption. In practice, data, such as income or expenditure data, often violate the normality assumption because of heavier tails. We first establish a new link between sample selection models and recently studied families of extended skew-elliptical distributions. Then, this allows us to introduce a selection-t (SLt) model, which models the error distribution using a Student's t distribution. We study its properties and investigate the finite-sample performance of the maximum likelihood estimators for this model. We compare the performance of the SLt model to the conventional Heckman selection-normal (SLN) model and apply it to analyze ambulatory expenditures. Unlike the SLN model, our analysis using the SLt model provides statistical evidence for the existence of sample selection bias in these data. We also investigate the performance of the test for sample selection bias based on the SLt model and compare it with the performances of several tests used with the SLN model. Our findings indicate that the latter tests can be misleading in the presence of heavy-tailed data.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文