跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究处理在群组层面随机分配的配对实验,核心是处理效应估计、随机化检验与推断精度。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yuehao Bai
Jizhou Liu
Azeem M. Shaikh
Max Tabord-Meehan

配对整群随机试验中的统计推断

研究问题
整群随机试验按基线协变量配对、每对随机分配一个处理群组时,如何对加权均值差进行有效推断?
方法与思路
作者区分是否按群组规模匹配的渐近情形,提出统一方差估计,并研究回归 t 检验、组内置换和协变量调整。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称统一方差估计支持渐近精确检验,常见回归检验通常保守;置换检验对特定原假设有效,调整可改善精度。
阅读关注点
应核对加权估计对应的目标参数、群组规模匹配的影响,以及置换检验的原假设和协变量调整改善精度的条件。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 RePEc 出版社摘要;抽样与匹配条件、特定原假设和精度改善条件未说明,结论不能推广至所有设计。

原文摘要

This paper studies inference in cluster randomized trials where treatment status is determined according to a “matched pairs” design. Here, by a cluster randomized experiment, we mean one in which treatment is assigned at the level of the cluster; by a “matched pairs” design, we mean that a sample of clusters is paired according to baseline, cluster-level covariates and, within each pair, one cluster is selected at random for treatment. We study the large-sample behavior of a weighted difference-in-means estimator and derive two distinct sets of results depending on if the matching procedure does or does not match on cluster size. We then propose a single variance estimator which is consistent in either regime. Combining these results establishes the asymptotic exactness of tests based on these estimators. Next, we consider the properties of two common testing procedures based on t-tests constructed from linear regressions, and argue that both are generally conservative in our framework. We additionally study the behavior of a randomization test which permutes the treatment status for clusters within pairs, and establish its finite-sample and asymptotic validity for testing specific null hypotheses. Finally, we propose a covariate-adjusted estimator which adjusts for additional baseline covariates not used for treatment assignment, and establish conditions under which such an estimator leads to strict improvements in precision. A simulation study confirms the practical relevance of our theoretical results.

笔记与分组