Optimal allocation to maximize the power of two-sample tests for binary response
最大化二元响应两样本检验功效的最优分配AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦两样本检验的样本分配与功效,没有明确提出因果识别或处理效应估计方法。
反馈分类问题最大化二元响应两样本检验功效的最优分配AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study allocations that maximize the power of tests of equality of two treatments having binary outcomes. When a normal approximation applies, the asymptotic power is maximized by minimizing the variance, leading to a Neyman allocation that assigns observations in proportion to the standard deviations. This allocation, which in general requires knowledge of the parameters of the problem, is recommended in a large body of literature. Under contiguous alternatives the normal approximation indeed applies, and in this case the Neyman allocation reduces to a balanced design. However, when studying the power under a noncontiguous alternative, a large deviations approximation is needed, and the Neyman allocation is no longer asymptotically optimal. In the latter case, the optimal allocation depends on the parameters, but is rather close to a balanced design. Thus, a balanced design is a viable option for both contiguous and noncontiguous alternatives. Finite sample studies show that a balanced design is indeed generally quite close to being optimal for power maximization. This is good news as implementation of a balanced design does not require knowledge of the parameters.