跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于通用积分近似与统计推断理论,没有所列经济或金融细分方向的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Luke Tierney
Robert E. Kass
Joseph B. Kadane

非正函数期望与方差的完全指数型拉普拉斯近似

研究问题
如何把原本针对正函数后验期望的完全指数型拉普拉斯近似,扩展到不要求处处为正的函数期望及方差计算?
方法与思路
作者先对具有正被积函数的矩母函数作完全指数型近似,再求导获得期望与方差,并讨论加常数后取极限的等价构造。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法给出二阶近似,与若干已有展开形式等价且不需似然三阶导数,并指出其也可用于部分非贝叶斯推断。
阅读关注点
应核对矩母函数存在性、求导与近似交换的条件、所需导数阶数,以及文中形式操作的严格论证所依赖的外部材料。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,不能推断刊本变化。摘要明确称本文省略形式操作的严格证明;二阶近似的适用条件和误差界未说明。

原文摘要

Tierney and Kadane (1986) presented a simple second-order approximation for posterior expectations of positive functions. They used Laplace's method for asymptotic evaluation of integrals, in which the integrand is written as f(θ)exp(-nh(θ)) and the function h is approximated by a quadratic. The form in which they applied Laplace's method, however, was fully exponential: The integrand was written instead as exp[− nh(θ) + log f(θ)]; this allowed first-order approximations to be used in the numerator and denominator of a ratio of integrals to produce a second-order expansion for the ratio. Other second-order expansions (Hartigan 1965; Johnson 1970; Lindley 1961, 1980; Mosteller and Wallace 1964) require computation of more derivatives of the log-likelihood function. In this article we extend the fully exponential method to apply to expectations and variances of nonpositive functions. To obtain a second-order approximation to an expectation E(g(θ)), we use the fully exponential method to approximate the moment-generating function E(exp(sg(θ))), whose integrand is positive, and then differentiate the result. This method is formally equivalent to that of Lindley and that of Mosteller and Wallace, yet does not require third derivatives of the likelihood function. It is also equivalent to another alternative approach to the approximation of E(g(θ)): We may add a large constant c to g(θ), apply the fully exponential method to E(c + g(θ)), and subtract c; on passing to the limit as c tends to infinity we regain the approximation based on the moment-generating function. Furthermore, the second derivative of the logarithm of the approximation E(exp(sg(θ))), which is an approximate cumulant-generating function, yields a simple second-order approximation to the variance. In deriving these results we omit rigorous justification of formal manipulations, which may be found in Kass, Tierney, and Kadane (in press). Although our point of view is Bayesian, our results have applications to non-Bayesian inference as well (DiCiccio 1986).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文