Locally Efficient Estimators for Semiparametric Models With Measurement Error
半参数测量误差模型的局部有效估计量AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用半参数测量误差模型,重复观测或工具变量用于误差参数估计,并未明确涉及因果效应或结构估计。
半参数测量误差模型的局部有效估计量AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We derive constructive locally efficient estimators in semiparametric measurement error models. The setting is one in which the likelihood function depends on variables measured with and without error, where the variables measured without error can be modeled nonparametrically. The algorithm is based on backfitting. We show that if one adopts a parametric model for the latent variable measured with error and if this model is correct, then the estimator is semiparametric efficient; if the latent variable model is misspecified, then our methods lead to a consistent and asymptotically normal estimator. Our method further produces an estimator of the nonparametric function that achieves the standard bias and variance property. We extend the methodology to allow estimation of parameters in the measurement error model by additional data in the form of replicates or instrumental variables. The methods are illustrated through a simulation study and a data example, where the putative latent variable distribution is a shifted lognormal, but concerns about the effects of misspecification of this assumption and the linear assumption of another covariate demand a more model-robust approach. A special case of wide interest is the partial linear measurement error model. If one assumes that the model error and the measurement error are both normally distributed, then our estimator has a closed form. When a normal model for the unobservable variable is also posited, our estimator becomes consistent and asymptotically normally distributed for the general partially linear measurement error model, even without any of the normality assumptions under which the estimator is originally derived. We show that the method in fact reduces to a same estimator as that of Liang et al., thus demonstrating a previously unknown optimality property of their method.