跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以家庭纵向数据建立随机效应离散选择模型,直接对应离散选择与面板数据。

反馈分类问题

A Longitudinal Mixed Logit Model for Estimation of Push and Pull Effects in Residential Location Choice

用于居住区位选择推拉效应估计的纵向混合 Logit 模型

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Fiona Steele
William J. Browne

用于居住区位选择推拉效应估计的纵向混合 Logit 模型

研究问题
利用家庭随时间变化的居住选择,如何区分社区特征对迁出当前地区的推力与对目的地选择的拉力,并刻画家庭间异质性?
方法与思路
作者构造纵向随机效应离散选择模型,分别参数化迁出与目的地效应,引入家庭和地区随机效应,并设计适用于大型数据的 MCMC。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称英国应用显示贫困程度对迁出和目的地选择的影响具有明显家庭差异,并报告处境较差家庭的选择受到严重约束的证据。
阅读关注点
应核对推力与拉力分离所依赖的参数限制、家庭及地区随机效应的设定,以及社区特征内生性和选择约束的解释依据。
阅读边界
材料为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,无法核对刊本变化;摘要未说明因果识别策略、效应数值或计算效率比较的具体结果。

原文摘要

We develop a random effects discrete choice model for the analysis of households’ choice of neighborhood over time. The model is parameterized in a way that exploits longitudinal data to separate the influence of neighborhood characteristics on the decision to move out of the current area (“push” effects) and on the choice of one destination over another (“pull” effects). Random effects are included to allow for unobserved heterogeneity between households in their propensity to move, and in the importance placed on area characteristics. The model also includes area-level random effects. The combination of a large choice set, large sample size, and repeated observations mean that existing estimation approaches are often infeasible. We, therefore, propose an efficient MCMC algorithm for the analysis of large-scale datasets. The model is applied in an analysis of residential choice in England using data from the British Household Panel Survey linked to neighborhood-level census data. We consider how effects of area deprivation and distance from the current area depend on household characteristics and life course transitions in the previous year. We find substantial differences between households in the effects of deprivation on out-mobility and selection of destination, with evidence of severely constrained choices among less-advantaged households. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文