阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
分类依据题名和摘要中的方法词与领域语境,不使用期刊名称猜测研究方向。
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
原文摘要
Ridge regression is a well-known technique to estimate the coefficients of a linear model. The method of regularization is a similar approach commonly used to solve underdetermined linear equations with discrete noisy data. When applying such a technique, the choice of the smoothing (or regularization) parameter $h$ is crucial. Generalized cross-validation (GCV) and Mallows' $C_L$ are two popular methods for estimating a good value for $h,$ from the data. Their asymptotic properties, such as consistency and asymptotic optimality, have been largely studied [Craven and Wahba (1979); Golub, Heath and Wahba (1979); Speckman (1985)]. Very interesting convergence results for the actual (random) parameter given by GCV and $C_L$ have been shown by Li (1985, 1986). Recently, Girard (1987, 1989) has proposed fast randomized versions of GCV and $C_L.$ The purpose of this paper is to show that the above convergence results also hold for these new methods.