Theory for Identification and Inference with Synthetic Controls: A Proximal Causal Inference Framework
合成控制的识别与推断:近端因果推断框架AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究面板数据中单个处理单位的合成控制与处理效应识别。
合成控制的识别与推断:近端因果推断框架AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Synthetic control (SC) methods are commonly used to estimate the treatment effect on a single treated unit in panel data settings. An SC is a weighted average of control units built to match the treated unit, with weights typically estimated by regressing pre-treatment outcomes and measured covariates of the treated unit to those of the control units. However, the classical SC method was primarily proposed for empirical settings where a good pre-treatment fit is attainable (Abadie et al., 2010). In this paper, we introduce a proximal causal inference framework to formalize identification and inference for both the SC and ultimately the treatment effect on the treated, based on the observation that control units not contributing to the construction of an SC can be repurposed as proxies of latent confounders, thus extending the applicability of SC methods to cases where the pre-treatment fit is poor even with many pre-treatment periods. We show that several existing uncertainty quantification methods of treatment effect for the classical SC methods can be adapted to the proximal inference approach. The proposed framework can accommodate nonlinear models, which allows for binary and count outcomes both of which remain understudied in the SC literature. We illustrate with comprehensive simulation studies and an application to the evaluation of the 1990 German Reunification.