Identification of a rational inattention discrete choice model
理性疏忽离散选择模型的识别AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究理性疏忽离散选择模型的非参数识别、矩条件与结构参数估计。
理性疏忽离散选择模型的识别AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper studies the non-parametric identification and estimation of an empirical rational inattention discrete choice model. Decision-makers do not observe their realized utility perfectly but can obtain a costly signal to inform them about the utility. This model nests the standard discrete choice model as a special case. We characterize the identified set of decision-makers’ prior beliefs based on cross-sectional market-level choice probabilities. We show that the standard discrete choice model is always observationally equivalent to some rational inattention discrete choice models with costly information. We then characterize the moment conditions that can be used to estimate the model parameters. When an exogenous variation of the choice set is available, we show that we can distinguish the standard discrete choice model from the rational inattention discrete choice model with costly information. We apply the model to study the Fox News effect on the 2000 U.S. presidential election. We compare the voters’ prior beliefs with and without the Fox News influence. The result shows that the presence of Fox News has heterogeneous effects for voters with different educational backgrounds.