跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦疾病登记的删失生存模型,未明确涉及因果效应、经济分布效应或其他所列专门方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yudong Wang
Jiayi Tong
Xiangbin Hu
Zhi-Sheng Ye
Cheng Yong Tang
Yong Chen

双层删失生存数据的半参数筛估计

研究问题
疾病登记中的随机退出、死亡报告延迟与数据冻结共同形成双层右删失时,如何估计生存分布及协变量的回归作用?
方法与思路
作者以相位型分布构造半参数筛模型,通过加速失效时间模型纳入协变量,并设计 EM 算法计算筛极大似然估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立筛估计的一致性和收敛速率,以及回归参数的渐近正态性与半参数效率;模拟和应用显示忽视报告延迟可产生较大偏差。
阅读关注点
应核对两层删失与报告延迟的联合建模条件、筛空间增长方式、EM 计算细节,以及效率结论对应的参数和模型。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断删失独立性、可识别性条件和偏差大小;肺癌登记示例不能直接推广,刊本变化未提供。

原文摘要

Summary Disease registry data provide important information on the progression of disease conditions. However, reports of death or drop-out of patients enrolled in the registry are always subject to a noticeable delay. Reporting delays, together with the administrative censoring that arises from a freeze date in data collection, lead to two layers of right censoring in the data. The first layer results from random drop-out and acts on the survival time. The second layer is the administrative censoring, which acts on the sum of the reporting delay and the minimum of the survival time and random drop-out time. The heterogeneities among patients further complicate data analysis. This paper proposes a novel semiparametric sieve method based on phase-type distributions, in which covariates can be readily accommodated by the accelerated failure time model. A well-orchestrated EM algorithm is developed to compute the sieve maximum likelihood estimator. We establish the consistency and rate of convergence of the proposed sieve estimators, as well as the asymptotic normality and semiparametric efficiency of the estimators for the regression parameters. Comprehensive simulations and a real example of lung cancer registry data are used to demonstrate the proposed method. The results reveal substantial biases if reporting delays are overlooked.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文