Union membership density and wages: The role of worker, firm, and job-title heterogeneity
工会会员密度与工资：劳动者、企业和职位异质性的作用AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确研究工资不平等以及工会密度工资差距在低工资劳动者中的分布差异。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
工会会员密度与工资：劳动者、企业和职位异质性的作用
- 研究问题
- 在集体协议覆盖率远高于工会会员比例的葡萄牙，工会密度与工资差距如何关联，劳动者、企业和职位分别解释多少？
- 方法与思路
- 作者使用劳动者、企业及集体谈判协议数据，通过 Gelbach 分解区分工资差距来源，并分析工资组成与工资分布差异。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称企业固定效应解释约三分之二的工资差距，职位固定效应解释约三分之一；工会密度还与较低工资不平等相关。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对固定效应与 Gelbach 分解的设定、工资缓冲部分的定义，以及低工资劳动者受益更多的分布分析依据。
- 阅读边界
- 仅依据所给出版社摘要；报告的是关联与分解，不能直接解释为工会的因果效应，摘要也未说明分解结果的不确定性。
原文摘要
We examine the association between union density and wages in Portugal where just 10 percent of all workers are union members but nine-tenths of them are covered by collective agreements. Using a unique dataset on workers, firms, and collective bargaining agreements, we examine the union density wage gap in total monthly wages and its sources – namely, worker, firm, and job-title or ‘occupational’ heterogeneity – using the Gelbach decomposition. The most important source of the mark-up associated with union density is the firm fixed effect, reflecting the differing wage policies of more and less unionized workplaces, which explains two-thirds of the wage gap. Next in importance is the job-title fixed effect, capturing occupational heterogeneity across industries. It makes up one-third of the gap, the inference being that the unobserved skills of workers contribute at most only trivially to the union density wage gap. In a separate analysis based on disaggregations of the total wage, it is also found that employers can in part offset the impact of the bargaining power of unions on wages through firm-specific wage arrangements in the form of the wage cushion. Finally, union density is shown to be associated with a modest reduction in wage inequality as the union density wage gap is highest among low-wage workers. This result is driven by the job-title fixed effect, low-wage workers benefiting more from being placed in higher paying ‘occupations.’