阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
分类依据题名和摘要中的方法词与领域语境,不使用期刊名称猜测研究方向。
反馈分类问题正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
原文摘要
For testing the goodness-of-fit of a $\log$-linear model to a multi-way contingency table with cell proportions estimated from survey data, Rao and Scott (1984) derived a first-order correction, $\delta\ldot$, to Pearson chi-square statistic, $X^2$ (or the likelihood ratio statistic, $G^2$) that takes account of the survey design. It was also shown that $\delta\ldot$ requires the knowledge of only the cell design effects (deffs) and the marginal deffs provided the model admits direct solution to likelihood equations under multinomial sampling. Simple upper bounds on $\delta\ldot$ are obtained here for models not admitting direct solutions, also requiring only cell deffs and marginal deffs or some generalized deffs not depending on any hypothesis. Applicability of an $F$-statistic used in GLIM to test a nested hypothesis is also investigated. In the case of a logit model involving a binary response variable, simple upper bounds on $\delta\ldot$ are obtained in terms of deffs of response proportions for each factor combination or some generalized deffs not depending on any hypothesis. Applicability of the GLIM $F$-statistic for nested hypotheses is also studied.