跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

分类依据题名和摘要中的方法词与领域语境,不使用期刊名称猜测研究方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yoel Haitovsky

原文摘要

Summary Two alternative methods for dealing with the problem of missing observations in regression analysis are investigated. One is to discard all incomplete observations and to apply the ordinary least-squares technique only to the complete observations. The alternative is to compute the covariances between all pairs of variables, each time using only the observations having values of both variables, and to apply these covariances in constructing the system of normal equations. The former is shown to be equivalent to the Fisher–Yates method of assigning “neutral” values to missing entries in experimental design. The investigation is carried out by means of simulation. Eight sets of regression data were generated, differing from each other with respect to important factors. Various deletion patterns are applied to these regression data. The estimates resulting from applying the two alternative methods to the data with missing entries are compared with the known regression equations. In almost all the cases which were investigated the former method (ordinary least squares applied only to the complete observations) is judged superior. However, when the proportion of incomplete observations is high or when the pattern of the missing entries is highly non-random, it seems plausible that one of the many methods of assigning values to the missing entries should be applied.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文