跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究有偏抽样下的通用独立性检验,未直接涉及因果效应、分布效应或其他所列专门方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yaniv Tenzer
Micha Mandel
Or Zuk

有偏抽样下的独立性检验

研究问题
当截断、删失或长度偏倚等抽样机制制造表面依赖时,如何定义可检验的准独立性并识别相对于该机制的偏离?
方法与思路
作者按抽样机制推广准独立性,构造受 Hoeffding 统计量启发的两个统计量,并用自助法或非均匀置换计算零假设分布。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文证明检验有效性,处理伴随删失的截断情形,并在模拟及四个数据应用中展示若干特殊情形的功效改进。
阅读关注点
应核对准独立性与总体独立性的区别、抽样机制可知或需估计时的要求,以及非均匀置换和自助法有效性的条件。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;抽样机制估计的具体条件和检验有效性的形式未说明,不能等同于解决一般因果选择偏差。

原文摘要

Testing for dependence between pairs of random variables is a fundamental problem in statistics. In some applications, data are subject to selection bias that can create spurious dependence. An important example is truncation models, in which observed pairs are restricted to a specific subset of the X-Y plane. Standard tests for independence are not suitable in such cases, and alternative tests that take the selection bias into account are required. Here, we generalize the notion of quasi-independence with respect to the sampling mechanism, and study the problem of detecting any deviations from it. We develop two tests statistics motivated by the classic Hoeffding’s statistic, and use two approaches to compute their distribution under the null: (i) a bootstrap-based approach, and (ii) a permutation-test with nonuniform probability of permutations. We also handle an important application to the case of censoring with truncation, by estimating the biased sampling mechanism from the data. We prove the validity of the tests, and show, using simulations, that they improve power compared to competing methods for important special cases. The tests are applied to four datasets, two that are subject to truncation, with and without censoring, and two to bias mechanisms related to length bias.

笔记与分组