Likelihood Ratio Methods for Monitoring Parameters of a Nested Random Effect Model
监测嵌套随机效应模型参数的似然比方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究工业质量监控中的嵌套随机效应,未明确涉及面板数据或所列宏观结构变化方向。
反馈分类问题监测嵌套随机效应模型参数的似然比方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In many practical situations the variance of a set of measurements can be attributed to several known sources of variability. For example, if several measurements of each item of a lot are taken, then one may need to deal not only with the within-item variability, but also with item-to-item within-lot and lot-to-lot components of variability. In such cases conventional control charts tend to produce an unacceptably high rate of false alarms and in general represent a rather weak diagnostic tool. This article shows how to build a control system based on likelihood ratio tests capable of monitoring the mean and variance components of a nested random effect model. The strong points and weaknesses of this approach are compared to those of competing methods, and some examples related to manufacturing of integrated circuits are discussed.