跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维回归推断,未明确关联因果识别、面板或其他所列细分问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Peng Wang
Min-ge Xie
Linjun Zhang

利用再现样本进行高维线性回归模型与系数的有限样本及大样本推断

研究问题
高维线性回归中,如何同时处理非零系数模型的选择不确定性与系数推断,并为有限样本和大样本提供覆盖保证?
方法与思路
作者在repro samples框架下模拟数据生成机制,以Fisher反演构建候选模型集,再构造模型、系数及其联合置信集。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提供有限样本与渐近保证;数值比较中,相比去偏和自助法得到更好的覆盖与更小的置信集,尚需核对比较设定。
阅读关注点
应核对稀疏模型与误差条件、候选集包含真模型的概率保证、有限样本覆盖的含义,以及模型搜索的计算成本。
阅读边界
摘要未给出覆盖保证所需的具体条件、模拟设定和计算规模;高斯及非高斯误差下的陈述不能解释为适用于任意误差分布。

原文摘要

In this paper, we present a novel and effective inference approach to conduct both finite and large sample inference for high-dimensional linear regression models. This approach is developed under the so-called repro samples framework, in which we conduct statistical inference by creating and studying the behavior of artificial samples that are obtained by mimicking the sampling mechanism of the data. We construct confidence sets for (a) the true model corresponding to the nonzero coefficients, (b) a single or any collection of regression coefficients and (c) both the model and regression coefficients jointly. To facilitate the constructions of these confidence sets and overcome computational difficulties of searching all possible models, we use an innovative Fisher inversion technique to construct a model candidate set that includes the true sparse model with probability close to 1 for models with both Gaussian and non-Gaussian errors. The proposed approach fills in two major gaps in the high-dimensional regression literature: (1) lack of effective approaches to addressing model selection uncertainty and providing valid inference for the underlying true model; (2) lack of effective inference approaches to guarantee finite sample performance. We provide both finite sample and asymptotic results to theoretically guarantee the performance of the proposed methods. In addition, our numerical results demonstrate that the proposed methods are valid and achieve better coverage with smaller confidence sets than the current state-of-the-art approaches, such as debiasing and bootstrap approaches.

笔记与分组