跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用二分类逻辑回归的计算抽样,未涉及经济离散选择行为或所列预测应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
William Fithian
Trevor Hastie

局部病例—对照抽样:类别不平衡数据的高效子抽样

研究问题
在类别严重不平衡的逻辑回归中,如何通过小规模子抽样节约计算,同时控制估计方差并应对模型设定错误?
方法与思路
作者利用先导估计实施特征空间中的接受—拒绝抽样,优先保留条件下罕见的响应,再对参数作解析校正。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,先导估计一致时方法可估计总体风险最小化系数;正确设定且先导一致独立时,渐近方差为全样本的两倍。
阅读关注点
应核对模型误设下的目标参数、先导估计要求,以及提高接受概率并加权时,样本规模与渐近方差如何变化。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;两倍方差结论有明确条件,摘要所称实验优势不能外推至任意不平衡数据或先导估计。

原文摘要

For classification problems with significant class imbalance, subsampling can reduce computational costs at the price of inflated variance in estimating model parameters. We propose a method for subsampling efficiently for logistic regression by adjusting the class balance locally in feature space via an accept–reject scheme. Our method generalizes standard case-control sampling, using a pilot estimate to preferentially select examples whose responses are conditionally rare given their features. The biased subsampling is corrected by a post-hoc analytic adjustment to the parameters. The method is simple and requires one parallelizable scan over the full data set. Standard case-control sampling is inconsistent under model misspecification for the population risk-minimizing coefficients $\theta^{*}$. By contrast, our estimator is consistent for $\theta^{*}$ provided that the pilot estimate is. Moreover, under correct specification and with a consistent, independent pilot estimate, our estimator has exactly twice the asymptotic variance of the full-sample MLE—even if the selected subsample comprises a miniscule fraction of the full data set, as happens when the original data are severely imbalanced. The factor of two improves to $1+\frac{1}{c}$ if we multiply the baseline acceptance probabilities by $c>1$ (and weight points with acceptance probability greater than 1), taking roughly $\frac{1+c}{2}$ times as many data points into the subsample. Experiments on simulated and real data show that our method can substantially outperform standard case-control subsampling.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文