跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用销售时间序列、自动验证选模与集成预测,支持时间序列和预测方法分类;实际应用对象是企业销售。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Thomas Gaertner
Christoph Lippert
Stefan Konigorski

中小企业的自动化需求预测

研究问题
在缺少专职数据科学团队的中小企业中,如何自动完成销售预测,并根据企业间需求模式差异选择合适模型?
方法与思路
作者构建包含数据准备、训练和验证选模的时间序列预测流程,预选统计与机器学习模型,并加入多模型集成预测。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,食品和电气行业企业中的测试表现存在差异:部分企业优于朴素预测,一家项目制企业未获益,没有单一模型普遍最优。
阅读关注点
应核对训练与验证的时间划分、预测期限、模型调参及集成规则,并检查各企业的朴素基准、评价指标和流程维护成本。
阅读边界
依据 arXiv 预印本摘要,不能确认同行评审或期刊接收;摘要未提供样本规模和具体误差,企业测试不能直接证明普遍适用。

原文摘要

In response to the growing demand for accurate demand forecasts, this research proposes a generalized automated sales forecasting pipeline tailored for small- to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Unlike large corporations with dedicated data scientists for sales forecasting, SMEs often lack such resources. To address this, we developed a comprehensive forecasting pipeline that automates time series sales forecasting, encompassing data preparation, model training, and selection based on validation results. The development included two main components: model preselection and the forecasting pipeline. In the first phase, state-of-the-art methods were evaluated on a showcase dataset, leading to the selection of ARIMA, SARIMAX, Holt-Winters Exponential Smoothing, Regression Tree, Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks, and Generalized Additive Models. An ensemble prediction of these models was also included. Long-Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks were excluded due to suboptimal prediction accuracy, and Facebook Prophet was omitted for compatibility reasons. In the second phase, the proposed forecasting pipeline was tested with SMEs in the food and electric industries, revealing variable model performance across different companies. While one project-based company derived no benefit, others achieved superior forecasts compared to naive estimators. Our findings suggest that no single model is universally superior. Instead, a diverse set of models, when integrated within an automated validation framework, can significantly enhance forecasting accuracy for SMEs. These results emphasize the importance of model diversity and automated validation in addressing the unique needs of each business. This research contributes to the field by providing SMEs access to state-of-the-art sales forecasting tools, enabling data-driven decision-making and improving operational efficiency.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文