跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要在随机试验中研究异质性处理获益及其排序,直接涉及因果效应学习。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lingli Yang
Bingxia Wang
Tian Chen
Han Zhu
Xuzhi Wang

删失随机试验中限制平均生存时间处理获益排序的直接学习

研究问题
随机试验存在右删失时,如何直接学习患者的条件限制平均生存时间处理获益排序,以支持治疗优先次序与患者选择?
方法与思路
作者构造删失调整的正交RMST伪结果,通过患者两两比较优化平滑排序损失,并修正事件及删失分布估计的影响。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称总体损失最小化者产生真实获益排序,估计方程具有Neyman正交性;模拟与乳腺癌试验应用报告排序改善。
阅读关注点
应核对删失识别条件、RMST时间上限、排序损失对应真实次序的条件,以及辅助模型估计误差与排序评价方式。
阅读边界
材料为arXiv v1预印本摘要,不能据此声称已同行评审或期刊接收;删失条件、收敛要求及应用中的改善幅度未说明。

原文摘要

In precision medicine, treatment decisions often depend more on identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from treatment than on accurately estimating benefit for every patient. However, existing methods estimate patient-specific treatment effects and derive patient rankings as a secondary step. We propose a direct ranking approach for conditional RMST treatment benefit in randomized trials with right-censored outcomes. We first construct a censoring-adjusted orthogonal RMST pseudo-outcome whose conditional expectation equals the true conditional RMST difference. Then, we compare patients pairwise and optimize a smooth ranking loss that directly targets treatment-benefit ordering. The pairwise criterion incorporates orthogonal corrections for estimation of the event and censoring distributions. We show that the population minimizer of the proposed loss induces the same ordering as the true conditional RMST treatment benefit and that the resulting estimating equation is Neyman-orthogonal to nuisance survival and censoring models. In simulation studies with nonlinear treatment-effect heterogeneity and moderate to heavy censoring, the proposed approach improved rank correlation and treatment-benefit enrichment relative to both plug-in RMST estimation and regression of the same RMST pseudo-outcome. Application to a randomized breast cancer trial demonstrated improved identification of patients with greater treatment benefit. In conclusion, the proposed framework combines orthogonal survival learning with pairwise ranking and may be particularly useful in precision medicine settings where treatment prioritization and patient selection are the primary goals.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文