Long-range Dependence in Daily Stock Volatilities
日频股票波动率的长程依赖AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是股票波动率的长程依赖及共同持久成分,直接对应波动率;研究使用日频数据,不能仅凭引言归入高频计量。
反馈分类问题日频股票波动率的长程依赖AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Recent empirical studies show that the squares of high-frequency stock returns are long-range dependent and can be modeled as fractionally integrated processes, using, for example, long-memory stochastic volatility models. Are such long-range dependencies common among stocks? Are they caused by the same sources of variation? In this article, we classify daily stock returns of Standard and Poor 500 companies on the basis of a company's size and its business or industrial sector and estimate the strength of long-range dependence in the stock volatilities using two different methods. Almost all of the companies analyzed exhibit strong persistence in volatility. We then use a canonical correlation method to identify common long-range dependent components in groups of companies, finding strong evidence in support of common persistence in volatility. Finally, we use a chi-squared test to study the effects of company size and sector on the number of common long-range dependent volatility components detected in groups of companies. Our results indicate the existence of some size effects, although they are not related to company size in a monotonic manner. On the other hand, the effects of company sector are pronounced. Randomly selected companies are found to be driven by a significantly larger number of persistent components than companies in certain business sectors, implying that persistence in stock volatility of companies in the same sector is more likely caused by the same source. These results suggest, among other interesting implications, that the volatilities of stocks for companies in the same business sector will be more often tied together in the longer run than will the volatilities of companies grouped only on the basis of size.