跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是股票波动率的长程依赖及共同持久成分,直接对应波动率;研究使用日频数据,不能仅凭引言归入高频计量。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Bonnie K. Ray
Ruey S. Tsay

日频股票波动率的长程依赖

研究问题
股票波动率的长程依赖是否普遍存在,不同公司的持久性是否来自共同成分,以及这些共同成分与公司规模和行业有何关系?
方法与思路
作者按规模和行业对标普500公司分组,用两种方法估计波动长记忆,以典型相关识别共同成分,再以卡方检验比较分组差异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所分析公司几乎都具有持久波动,共同持久成分的证据较强;行业效应明显,规模效应存在但不呈单调关系。
阅读关注点
应核对两种长记忆估计方法、波动代理、共同成分的判定与检验条件,并查看样本选择、行业划分及分组方式如何影响结果。
阅读边界
摘要未说明两种估计方法的细节、样本期或稳健性;共同持久性与行业差异不能识别具体共同冲击,也不能直接解释为行业因果效应。

原文摘要

Recent empirical studies show that the squares of high-frequency stock returns are long-range dependent and can be modeled as fractionally integrated processes, using, for example, long-memory stochastic volatility models. Are such long-range dependencies common among stocks? Are they caused by the same sources of variation? In this article, we classify daily stock returns of Standard and Poor 500 companies on the basis of a company's size and its business or industrial sector and estimate the strength of long-range dependence in the stock volatilities using two different methods. Almost all of the companies analyzed exhibit strong persistence in volatility. We then use a canonical correlation method to identify common long-range dependent components in groups of companies, finding strong evidence in support of common persistence in volatility. Finally, we use a chi-squared test to study the effects of company size and sector on the number of common long-range dependent volatility components detected in groups of companies. Our results indicate the existence of some size effects, although they are not related to company size in a monotonic manner. On the other hand, the effects of company sector are pronounced. Randomly selected companies are found to be driven by a significantly larger number of persistent components than companies in certain business sectors, implying that persistence in stock volatility of companies in the same sector is more likely caused by the same source. These results suggest, among other interesting implications, that the volatilities of stocks for companies in the same business sector will be more often tied together in the longer run than will the volatilities of companies grouped only on the basis of size.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文