Fast computation of exact confidence intervals for randomized experiments with binary outcomes
二元结果随机实验精确置信区间的快速计算AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机实验中平均因果效应及其他因果目标的精确区间推断。
二元结果随机实验精确置信区间的快速计算AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Given a randomized experiment with binary outcomes, exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect of the treatment can be computed through a series of permutation tests. This approach requires minimal assumptions and is valid for all sample sizes, as it does not rely on large-sample approximations such as those implied by the central limit theorem. We show that these confidence intervals can be found in O(nlogn) permutation tests in the case of balanced designs, where the treatment and control groups have equal sizes, and O(n2) permutation tests in the general case. Prior to this work, the most efficient known constructions required O(n2) such tests in the balanced case (Li and Ding, 2016), and O(n4) tests in the general case (Rigdon and Hudgens, 2015). Our results thus facilitate exact inference as a viable option for randomized experiments far larger than those accessible by previous methods. We also generalize our construction to produce confidence intervals for other causal estimands, including the relative risk ratio and odds ratio, yielding similar computational gains.