跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及通用函数型与高维预测,未提供宏观预测或经济因子模型的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Peter Hall
You-Jun Yang

多元或函数型数据线性预测中的成分排序与选择

研究问题
在高维向量与函数型数据的线性预测中,如何论证常规成分选择,并确定用于预测的成分数量?
方法与思路
作者以对每个样本量成立的极小极大论证支持常规选择方法,再从理论与数值两方面研究交叉验证选取成分数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,其论证具有非渐近性质,且交叉验证在包括函数型数据的设定下可渐近最小化平均累加平方误差。
阅读关注点
应核对常规成分排序的确切含义、极小极大比较的模型类,以及交叉验证误差准则与预测目标之间的对应关系。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要;摘要未说明模型类、具体条件及数值比较结果,不能据此判断任意高维预测中的最优成分选择。

原文摘要

Summary The problem of component choice in regression-based prediction has a long history. The main cases where important choices must be made are functional data analysis, and problems in which the explanatory variables are relatively high dimensional vectors. Indeed, principal component analysis has become the basis for methods for functional linear regression. In this context the number of components can also be interpreted as a smoothing parameter, and so the viewpoint is a little different from that for standard linear regression. However, arguments for and against conventional component choice methods are relevant to both settings and have received significant recent attention. We give a theoretical argument, which is applicable in a wide variety of settings, justifying the conventional approach. Although our result is of minimax type, it is not asymptotic in nature; it holds for each sample size. Motivated by the insight that is gained from this analysis, we give theoretical and numerical justification for cross-validation choice of the number of components that is used for prediction. In particular we show that cross-validation leads to asymptotic minimization of mean summed squared error, in settings which include functional data analysis.

笔记与分组