跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用高维预测风险估计,应用为神经记录数据,未对应所列经济预测方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kamiar Rahnama Rad
Arian Maleki

通过近似留一交叉验证高效估计样本外预测误差

研究问题
当特征维数接近或超过观测数时,如何以较低计算成本近似留一交叉验证,并估计正则化模型的样本外风险?
方法与思路
作者为一大类正则化估计量提出闭式近似留一公式,在已有估计基础上计算,并建立其与精确留一结果之差的有限样本上界。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,两者之差在高维渐近下以极高概率趋零,理论无需回归系数稀疏性,并以模拟和神经记录数据展示表现。
阅读关注点
应核对适用的损失与正则化形式、数据生成条件、误差上界的维度依赖,以及额外计算成本和风险估计偏差。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要;近似留一与精确留一接近,不足以单独证明真实样本外风险估计准确,具体条件与误差数值未说明。

原文摘要

Summary The paper considers the problem of out-of-sample risk estimation under the high dimensional settings where standard techniques such as K-fold cross-validation suffer from large biases. Motivated by the low bias of the leave-one-out cross-validation method, we propose a computationally efficient closed form approximate leave-one-out formula ALO for a large class of regularized estimators. Given the regularized estimate, calculating ALO requires a minor computational overhead. With minor assumptions about the data-generating process, we obtain a finite sample upper bound for the difference between leave-one-out cross-validation and approximate leave-one-out cross-validation, |LO−ALO|. Our theoretical analysis illustrates that |LO−ALO|→0 with overwhelming probability, when n, p → ∞, where the dimension p of the feature vectors may be comparable with or even greater than the number of observations, n. Despite the high dimensionality of the problem, our theoretical results do not require any sparsity assumption on the vector of regression coefficients. Our extensive numerical experiments show that |LO−ALO| decreases as n and p increase, revealing the excellent finite sample performance of approximate leave-one-out cross-validation. We further illustrate the usefulness of our proposed out-of-sample risk estimation method by an example of real recordings from spatially sensitive neurons (grid cells) in the medial entorhinal cortex of a rat.

笔记与分组