Sequential Comparison of Changes with Repeated Measurements Data
重复测量数据中变化速率的序贯比较AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要处理同一患者跨时间的重复测量,并使用线性混合效应模型分析纵向变化。
反馈分类问题重复测量数据中变化速率的序贯比较AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
There are many clinical trials in which the patients enter sequentially, and a response variable is measured repeatedly over time for each patient. A group sequential procedure is proposed for comparing the rates of change between two treatment groups. Some existing procedures for testing the equality of means between two treatment groups with repeated measurements data, such as those proposed by Armitage, Stratton, and Worthington and by Geary, can be interpreted as special cases of the proposed procedure. Under a linear mixed effects model, the asymptotic joint distribution of the sequentially computed statistics is derived. Construction of the group sequential boundaries is based on this distribution theory. The extension to nonnormal distributions of errors is also discussed. The proposed procedure allows for using either the sequential method of Slud and Wei or that of Lan and DeMets. This procedure is then applied to repeated bone density measurements on a sample of 74 middle-aged women and implemented by the method of Lan and DeMets.