跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究分层调查与小区域均值估计,但未给出面板结构或其他所列经济计量对象,故不强行分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Vipin Arora
P. Lahiri
Kanchan Mukherjee

复杂调查中有限总体均值的经验贝叶斯估计

研究问题
在分层抽样且各层均值与抽样方差存在差异时,如何跨层共享信息以估计有限总体均值,并完整评估估计的不确定性?
方法与思路
作者为各层随机截距与随机抽样方差设置共同先验,构造经验贝叶斯均值估计,并用 bootstrap 评估包含模型参数估计的变异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,估计量具有 Robbins 意义下的渐近最优性,并讨论与经典回归估计的损失比较;模型可用于重复调查和小区域估计。
阅读关注点
应核对超总体与跨层先验假设、随机方差的估计、渐近最优性的具体框架,以及 bootstrap 是否涵盖所有所述变异来源。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;渐近条件与数值比较未展开,重复调查的适用描述不足以确定面板结构。

原文摘要

Estimation of finite population means is considered when samples are collected using a stratified sampling design. Finite populations for different strata are assumed to be realizations from different superpopulations. The true means of the observations lie on a regression surface with random intercepts for different strata. The true sampling variances are also different and random for different strata. The strata are connected through two common prior distributions, one for the intercepts and another for the sampling variances for all the strata. The model is appropriate in two important survey situations. First, it can be applied to repeated surveys where the physical characteristics of the sampling units change slowly over time. Second, the model is appropriate in small-area estimation problems where a very few samples are available for any particular area. Empirical Bayes estimators of the finite population means are shown to be asymptotically optimal in the sense of Robbins. The proposed empirical Bayes estimators are also compared to the classical regression estimators in terms of the relative savings loss due to Efron and Morris. A measure of variability of the proposed empirical Bayes estimator is considered based on bootstrap samples. This measure of variability incorporates all sources of variations due to the estimation of various model parameters. A numerical study is conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed empirical Bayes estimator compared to rival estimators.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文