A Sample Reuse Method for Accurate Parametric Empirical Bayes Confidence Intervals
构造准确参数经验贝叶斯置信区间的样本再利用方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用经验贝叶斯区间与重抽样校正,未明确对应所列经济学应用领域。
构造准确参数经验贝叶斯置信区间的样本再利用方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
SUMMARY Parametric empirical Bayes (EB) methods of point estimation for a vector of unknown parameters date to the landmark paper of James and Stein (1961). The usual approach is to use the mean of the estimated posterior distribution of each parameter, where the estimation of the prior parameters (‘hyperparameters’) is accomplished through the marginal distribution of the data. While point estimates computed this way usually perform well, interval estimates based on the estimated posterior (called ‘naive’ EB intervals) do not. They fail to account for the variability in the estimation of the hyperparameters, generally resulting in subnominal coverage probability in the EB sense defined in Morris (1983a). In this paper we extend our earlier work in which we proposed a conditional bias correction method for developing EB intervals which corrects the deficiencies in the naive intervals. We show how bias correction can be implemented in general via a type III parametric bootstrap procedure, a sample reuse method first employed by Laird and Louis (1987). Theoretical and simulation work indicates that the resulting intervals are accurate with respect to nominal coverage. We give a specific application (to Poisson failure rate data) where we compute simultaneous point and bias-corrected interval estimates.