Bootstrap Confidence Regions for Functional Relationships in Errors-in- Variables Models
测量误差模型中线性函数关系的 Bootstrap 置信域AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用测量误差与置信带,未明确涉及因果效应或经济结构模型,分类依据不足。
测量误差模型中线性函数关系的 Bootstrap 置信域AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We suggest bootstrap methods for constructing confidence bands (and intervals) for an unknown linear functional relationship in an errors-invariables model. It is assumed that the ratio of error variances is known to lie within an interval $\Lambda = \lbrack\lambda_1, \lambda_2\rbrack$. A confidence band is constructed for the range of possible linear relationships when $\lambda \in \Lambda$. Meaningful results are obtained even in the extreme case $\Lambda = \lbrack 0, \infty\rbrack$, which corresponds to no assumption being made about $\Lambda$. The bootstrap bands have several interesting features, which include the following: (i) the bands do not shrink to a line as $n \rightarrow \infty$, unless $\Lambda$ is a singleton (i.e., $\lambda_1 = \lambda_2)$; (ii) percentile-$t$ versions of the bands enjoy only first-order coverage accuracy, not the second-order accuracy normally found in simpler statistical problems.