跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以局部无混杂假设替代全局无未测混杂假设,并据此讨论因果解释。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shih-Ni Prim
Yawen Guan
Shu Yang
Ana G Rappold
K. Lloyd Hill
Wei-Lun Tsai
Corinna Keeler
Brian J Reich

多暴露与多结局空间回归的谱混杂调整

研究问题
多种环境暴露与健康结局之间的空间混杂可能随尺度和变量组合变化,如何调整这种偏差并赋予局部效应因果解释?
方法与思路
作者提出张量回归,使暴露效应随暴露、结局和空间尺度变化,并提取局部尺度效应,以局部无混杂假设支撑解释。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法提供多变量空间混杂调整后的简洁效应表示;美国南部应用报告经济韧性主题与糖尿病、血脂异常的方向性结果。
阅读关注点
应核对谱分解与局部尺度的定义、局部无混杂的正式假设,以及效应提取、尺度选择和未测混杂敏感性分析。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex所给在线优先版本摘要;局部无混杂不能由摘要验证,效应大小与识别细节未说明,不能推断后续刊本变化。

原文摘要

Characterizing social vulnerability is fundamental to disaster response planning. Numerous vulnerability indicators have been developed, but they are typically not validated for their predictive power over the outcomes of interest. As with many environmental health studies where interventions are impractical or unethical, validation of social vulnerability against public health outcomes is observational and relies on spatially-dependent data. Observational studies are susceptible to bias induced by unmeasured confounders. This problem is exacerbated in spatial studies with multiple health outcomes and environmental exposure variables, as the source and magnitude of confounding bias may differ by spatial scale and across exposure/outcome pairs. We propose to mitigate confounding effects in multivariate spatial studies using a tensor-regression model that allows exposure effects to vary by exposure, outcome, and spatial scale. By extracting exposure effects that correspond to local spatial scales, we replace the strict causal assumption of no unmeasured confounders with a more realistic assumption of local unconfoundedness i.e., differences between nearby regions are unconfounded, allowing for causal interpretation. Our study of the Southern United States shows that economic resilience (Theme 1) demonstrates the strongest positive effect on diabetes and negative effect on hyperlipidemia. Our analysis reveals a concise representation of the effects of social vulnerability indices on an array of chronic health outcomes, offering interpretable epidemiological insights that adjust for multivariate spatial confounding.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文