跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以 ARCH 参数的单侧约束检验是否存在条件异方差效应,与波动率建模直接相关。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

针对单侧备择假设的得分检验

研究问题
在存在干扰参数、备择假设对参数施加单侧约束时,如何只估计原假设模型便完成检验,并减少对精确似然的依赖?
方法与思路
作者提出得分类统计量,并在用估计函数替代似然得分的一般框架下讨论检验;以是否存在 ARCH 效应为应用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该统计量与似然比统计量渐近等价,仅需估计原假设模型,并可在已有双侧统计量的基础上方便地计算。
阅读关注点
应核对单侧约束与干扰参数如何影响参考分布、估计函数所需条件,以及 ARCH 示例中检验和临界值的计算。
阅读边界
OpenAlex 索引稿件版本未注明;摘要未提供参考分布和正则条件,不能把渐近等价理解为有限样本表现完全相同。

原文摘要

A score-type statistic, T s , is introduced for testing H: ψ = 0 against K: ψ ≥ 0 and more general one-sided hypotheses when nuisance parameters may be present; ψ is a vector parameter. The main advantages of T s , are that it requires estimation of the model only under the null hypothesis and that, it is asymptotically equivalent to the likelihood ratio statistic; these are precisely the reasons for the popularity of the score tests for testing against two-sided alternatives. In this sense, T s preserves the main attractive features of the classical two-sided score test. The theoretical results are presented in a general framework where the likelihood-based score function is replaced by an estimating function so that the test is applicable even if the exact population distribution is unknown. Computation of T s , is simplified by the fact that it can be computed easily once the corresponding two-sided statistic has been computed. The relevance and simplicity of T s are illustrated by discussing a data example in detail. This example involves an autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model, and the objective is to test for the presence of ARCH effect. The null and alternative hypotheses turn out to be of the form H: ψ = 0 and K: ψ ≥ 0 respectively where ψ is the vector of ARCH parameters. In contrast to the likelihood ratio and other equivalent forms that are currently available for testing against such one-sided hypotheses, we note the following: T s is convenient to apply, because the full ARCH model need not be estimated subject to the inequality constraint ψ ≥ 0 and we do not need to know the exact likelihood because T s is based on estimating equations rather than likelihoods.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文