跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确在随机临床试验中估计并比较治疗组生存率,对应治疗效应的因果推断方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Layla Parast
Lu Tian
Tianxi Cai

随机临床试验中生存率与治疗效应的界标估计

研究问题
在主要终点大量删失时,如何利用基线协变量和界标时点前的非致命中间事件,提高生存率及治疗组差异的估计效率?
方法与思路
作者提出半非参数两阶段程序,利用界标前中间事件信息估计并比较指定年限生存率,在随机试验中再加入校准步骤。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,模拟显示估计效率与检验功效可能明显提高,并以艾滋病临床试验数据展示生存率及两治疗组差异分析。
阅读关注点
应核对删失和中间事件的处理条件、界标时间选择,以及校准如何利用随机化信息并保持目标总体生存率的解释。
阅读边界
摘要未说明删失假设、稳健性条件及效率提升数值,不能直接推定可缩短试验。所据索引摘要版本未注明,刊本变化未知。

原文摘要

In many studies with a survival outcome, it is often not feasible to fully observe the primary event of interest. This often leads to heavy censoring and thus, difficulty in efficiently estimating survival or comparing survival rates between two groups. In certain diseases, baseline covariates and the event time of nonfatal intermediate events may be associated with overall survival. In these settings, incorporating such additional information may lead to gains in efficiency in estimation of survival and testing for a difference in survival between two treatment groups. If gains in efficiency can be achieved, it may then be possible to decrease the sample size of patients required for a study to achieve a particular power level or decrease the duration of the study. Most existing methods for incorporating intermediate events and covariates to predict survival focus on estimation of relative risk parameters and/or the joint distribution of events under semiparametric models. However, in practice, these model assumptions may not hold and hence may lead to biased estimates of the marginal survival. In this article, we propose a seminonparametric two-stage procedure to estimate and compare t-year survival rates by incorporating intermediate event information observed before some landmark time, which serves as a useful approach to overcome semicompeting risk issues. In a randomized clinical trial setting, we further improve efficiency through an additional calibration step. Simulation studies demonstrate substantial potential gains in efficiency in terms of estimation and power. We illustrate our proposed procedures using an AIDS Clinical Trial Protocol 175 dataset by estimating survival and examining the difference in survival between two treatment groups: zidovudine and zidovudine plus zalcitabine. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文