跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确针对高维混杂下的平均处理效应、倾向得分平衡和双重稳健因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yang Ning
Peng Sida
Kosuke Imai

通过高维协变量平衡倾向得分稳健估计因果效应

研究问题
当潜在混杂变量数量可能远大于样本量时,如何稳健估计观察研究的平均处理效应,并构造有效置信区间?
方法与思路
作者先惩罚估计倾向得分与结果模型,再平衡选定的结果预测协变量以校准倾向得分,最后构建逆概率加权估计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法具有样本有界性,在相应条件下达到根号样本量收敛和渐近正态;特定设定下有效,且具双重稳健推断性质。
阅读关注点
应核对高维稀疏性与识别条件、平衡变量的选择、单个模型正确时的推断证明,以及线性与广义线性结果模型的差别。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,高维速率与识别条件未详列;效率结论针对所述模型设定,数值优势不能普遍化或推断版本变化。

原文摘要

Summary We propose a robust method to estimate the average treatment effects in observational studies when the number of potential confounders is possibly much greater than the sample size. Our method consists of three steps. We first use a class of penalized $M$-estimators for the propensity score and outcome models. We then calibrate the initial estimate of the propensity score by balancing a carefully selected subset of covariates that are predictive of the outcome. Finally, the estimated propensity score is used to construct the inverse probability weighting estimator. We prove that the proposed estimator, which we call the high-dimensional covariate balancing propensity score, has the sample boundedness property, is root-$n$ consistent, asymptotically normal, and semiparametrically efficient when the propensity score model is correctly specified and the outcome model is linear in covariates. More importantly, we show that our estimator remains root-$n$ consistent and asymptotically normal so long as either the propensity score model or the outcome model is correctly specified. We provide valid confidence intervals in both cases and further extend these results to the case where the outcome model is a generalized linear model. In simulation studies, we find that the proposed methodology often estimates the average treatment effect more accurately than existing methods. We also present an empirical application, in which we estimate the average causal effect of college attendance on adulthood political participation. An open-source software package is available for implementing the proposed methodology.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文