Optimality and efficiency of two-treatment repeated measurement designs
两处理重复测量设计的最优性与效率AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究两处理交叉实验的最优设计,未涉及所列面板数据估计或因果识别方法。
两处理重复测量设计的最优性与效率AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
For an arbitrary covariance matrix and any number of treatments and periods, necessary and sufficient conditions for the optimality of a repeated measurements, i.e. crossover or changeover, design were given in the, as yet, unpublished report by H. B. Kushner ‘Optimal repeated measurements designs: the linear optimality equations’ (Kushner, report). Here we specialise the results to the two-treatment case. We give linear equations whose solutions are the proportions of subjects allocated to each treatment sequence in the most general optimal design. The treatment effects information matrix of an optimal design is also presented. The results are applied to several situations. For arbitrary covariance matrices, we show that designs consisting of at most two treatment sequences and their duals must necessarily be dual balanced to be optimal. For autoregressive covariance matrices, we confirm that designs of Matthews (1987) for three and four periods are optimal and we derive new optimal designs for five and six periods. Some optimality results of Laska & Meisner (1985) are extended. A simple formula for the efficiency of a dual balanced nonoptimal design is provided and used to compute the exact efficiencies of some of Kunert's (1991) designs.