跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用似然不可计算模型的贝叶斯推断;协方差中提到因子形式,不足以归入宏观或金融因子研究。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David T. Frazier
David J. Nott
Robert Kohn

合成似然贝叶斯推断:渐近性质与调整

研究问题
当复杂模型的似然难以计算但容易模拟时,合成似然后验何时能支持可靠推断,并如何权衡计算效率与协方差简化?
方法与思路
作者以多元正态近似汇总统计量分布,通过模拟估计均值和协方差,分析后验渐近性质并提出协方差误设下的调整。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在汇总统计量满足条件时获得后验渐近正态性和可信集覆盖保证,并比较与 ABC 的效率、提出调整推断方法。
阅读关注点
应核对汇总统计量的正则条件、模拟次数与样本量的关系,以及效率比较标准和协方差简化后的覆盖率修正。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的索引摘要;正则条件与成本比较口径未说明,不能把摘要所称效率优势推广到所有模型和汇总统计量。

原文摘要

Implementing Bayesian inference is often computationally challenging in complex models, especially when calculating the likelihood is difficult. Synthetic likelihood is one approach for carrying out inference when the likelihood is intractable, but it is straightforward to simulate from the model. The method constructs an approximate likelihood by taking a vector summary statistic as being multivariate normal, with the unknown mean and covariance estimated by simulation. Previous research demonstrates that the Bayesian implementation of synthetic likelihood can be more computationally efficient than approximate Bayesian computation, a popular likelihood-free method, in the presence of a high-dimensional summary statistic. Our article makes three contributions. The first shows that if the summary statistics are well-behaved, then the synthetic likelihood posterior is asymptotically normal and yields credible sets with the correct level of coverage. The second contribution compares the computational efficiency of Bayesian synthetic likelihood and approximate Bayesian computation. We show that Bayesian synthetic likelihood is computationally more efficient than approximate Bayesian computation. Based on the asymptotic results, the third contribution proposes using adjusted inference methods when a possibly misspecified form is assumed for the covariance matrix of the synthetic likelihood, such as diagonal or a factor model, to speed up computation. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组