Some Remarks on Noninformative Priors
关于无信息先验的若干讨论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般贝叶斯先验与覆盖匹配理论,没有明确的所列经济计量研究方向。
反馈分类问题关于无信息先验的若干讨论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article focuses primarily on a comparison between the reference priors of Berger and Bernardo and the reverse reference priors suggested by J. K. Ghosh. Sufficient conditions are given that provide agreement between the two classes of priors. Several examples are given showing the agreement or disagreement between the two. In addition, these priors are compared under a criterion that requires the frequentist coverage probability of the posterior region of a real-valued parametric function to match a nominal level with a remainder of O(n −1), where n denotes the sample size. The latter priors, first introduced by Welch and Peers, are obtained by solving a differential equation due to Peers. Finally, in the presence of several parameters of interest, a general class of priors that satisfies the matching criterion separately for each parameter is constructed, and examples are given to illustrate how reference or reverse reference priors fit within this class of priors.