Chaohua Dong, Jiti Gao and Oliver Linton’s Contribution to the Discussion of ‘Assumption-Lean Inference for Generalised Linear Model Parameters’ by Vansteelandt and Dukes
董朝华、高继挺与 Oliver Linton 对《广义线性模型参数的弱假设推断》的讨论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本主要讨论一般半参数效率、模型误设与高维平滑,未明确给出因果识别或其他所列领域的依据。
董朝华、高继挺与 Oliver Linton 对《广义线性模型参数的弱假设推断》的讨论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The title of this paper is ironically self-fulfilling, since there are almost no meaningful assumptions made throughout! The starting point is that we have some plausible semi-parametric model, which is a special case of a more general non-parametric model, but we wish to allow for misspecification and in particular define an estimand that is meaningful in the non-parametric model and that specialises in the plausible model to a slope coefficient. However, since the estimator that is proposed is not the semi-parametric efficient estimator of that slope coefficient under the semi-parametric model, we wonder what is the role of the model at all? The theory side of it seems to assume in Theorem 2, for example that E(Y | A, L) is consistently estimated in L2 under the full unrestricted -parametric setting. But if that is possible, then why bother with the model? The authors talk casually about machine learning methods being used to estimate E(Y | A, L), but if that is a silver bullet, then who needs the model? The model embodies some structure around A, L but the discussion is focussed away from the dimensionality of L, which is a big reason why one might want a structured model such as additivity (Linton & Nielsen, 1995) or the partial linear model (Robinson, 1988). Perhaps it would help if a full model was written down for the effect of high-dimensional L. Perhaps the point is that the parameter of interest is only defined in terms of low-dimensional conditional expectations, but this does not appear to be the case in the sense that high-dimensional smoothing is employed in (a) of p.14, which is then projected down by conditional expectation onto L, but if A is binary, then this has not reduced dimensionality at all, the dimensionality issue sits in L and what structure is assumed about its effect on Y. The authors say that the usual choice of smoothing parameter is not tuned to the estimand. This point has been made in Linton (1995) who derived an optimal bandwidth for estimation of slope parameters and Wald statistics in the partially linear model based on local polynomial estimators; the optimal rates are indeed different from those that minimise the mean squared error of the non-parametric regression involved.