Semiparametric Estimation of Brand Choice Behavior
品牌选择行为的半参数估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究消费者品牌选择及其效用建模;扫描面板是数据来源,尚不足以支持面板方法分类。
品牌选择行为的半参数估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In the marketing literature there does not seem to be a widely accepted answer to the question of whether, when purchasing brands in a given product category, consumers react differently to a reduction in price and an increase in the deal discount. Previous studies that have attempted to address this issue have assumed that prices and deals have a linear effect on a brand's indirect utility. In this article, we estimate the utility of price and discount nonparametrically. Instead of imposing a linear structure on this function, we require only that it be decreasing in price and increasing in deal amount. This specification allows for a general pattern of interaction effects between prices and deals to influence the systematic component of utility. Consistent with the recent literature on estimating brand choice models, we account for heterogeneity in brand preferences across consumers. We use both a semiparametric approach, in which the distribution of the stochastic components of brand utilities is specified parametrically, and a fully nonparametric approach, in which this distribution is left unspecified. We carry out our empirical analyses on household scanner panel datasets for four different product categories. Our empirical results reveal deviations from linearity in deal effects. In particular, deal effects appear to be concave for some products.