Bayesian evaluation of mutual fund performance with non-random missing data: Application to the Chinese market
非随机缺失数据下的共同基金绩效贝叶斯评估:中国市场应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究基金 alpha、风险调整绩效及样本外 alpha 预测,因此对应资产定价与收益预测两个方向。
非随机缺失数据下的共同基金绩效贝叶斯评估:中国市场应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper studies mutual fund performance evaluation, where non-random missing data is an important issue. Ignoring sample selection issues can lead to biased parameter estimates and invalid performance evaluation. Therefore, we propose a novel Beta selection model to characterize this non-random missingness mechanism. We can significantly reduce the bias in alpha estimates, by introducing our Beta selection mechanism into the Noise-Reduced Alpha (NRA) model of Harvey and Liu (2018). A computationally attractive Bayesian estimation procedure is also provided. Simulation results show that our proposed method achieves superior finite-sample performance compared to classical fund-by-fund ordinary least squares (OLS) and the baseline NRA model. Finally, we apply our method to Chinese mutual fund data, and find that: (i) our out-of-sample alpha forecasts exhibit greater predictive accuracy across all tested missingness rates; (ii) approximately 18% of funds exhibit statistically significant positive alphas, suggesting market-beating skill; and (iii) portfolios constructed using our method deliver significantly higher returns than those using alternative approaches.