跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于一般大规模检验与混合模型功效理论,未明确对应所列经济计量应用方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Thomas Porter
Michael Stewart

超越高阶批判:对稀少弱信号备择更敏感的检验

研究问题
当信号稀少且微弱时,具有相同低阶最优性质的检验能否在更高阶的功效比较中表现不同,差异是否依赖混合模型?
方法与思路
作者建立高阶功效分析框架,比较高阶批判检验与广义似然比检验,并研究基于经验矩母函数的互补检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,正态位置混合模型中似然比检验功效占优,另一混合模型中比较部分反转;矩母函数方法具有相同局部功效性质。
阅读关注点
应核对稀少弱信号的渐近设定、高阶功效的定义,以及两种混合模型为何改变检验比较和实现建议的适用范围。
阅读边界
OpenAlex 索引摘要未注明稿件版本,也未给出高阶展开和参数区域;其中的功效比较不能外推为所有模型下的优越性。

原文摘要

Higher criticism (HC) is a popular method for large-scale inference problems based on identifying unusually high proportions of small $p$-values. It has been shown to enjoy a lower-order optimality property in a simple normal location mixture model which is shared by the ‘tailor-made’ parametric generalised likelihood ratio test (GLRT) for the same model; however, HC has also been shown to perform well outside this ‘narrow’ model. We develop a higher-order framework for analysing the power of these and similar procedures, which reveals the perhaps unsurprising fact that the GLRT enjoys an edge in power over HC for the normal location mixture model. We also identify a similar parametric mixture model to which HC is similarly ‘tailor-made’ and show that the situation is (at least partly) reversed there. We also show that in the normal location mixture model a procedure based on the empirical moment-generating function enjoys the same local power properties as the GLRT and may be recommended as an easy to implement (and interpret), complementary procedure to HC. Some other practical advice regarding the implementation of these procedures is provided. Finally, we provide some simulation results to help interpret our theoretical findings.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文