Structural Stability Testing in Models Estimated by Generalized Method of Moments
广义矩估计模型中的结构稳定性检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将检验应用于解释国际股指收益的条件资本资产定价模型,因此标记资产定价,通用方法本身未限定宏观场景。
广义矩估计模型中的结构稳定性检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article proposes a new methodology for testing structural stability in models estimated via generalized method of moments. Like most previous studies of this general problem, attention is focused on the case in which some aspect of the model potentially changes at a single point in the sample, known as the “breakpoint.” Unlike this earlier work, however, our approach is based on a decomposition of the null hypothesis into two components involving parameter constancy and the validity of the overidentifying restrictions both before and after the suspected breakpoint. Using this framework, we propose a testing strategy that offers the potential to discriminate between parameter variation and more general forms of instability. Statistics are presented for testing our null hypotheses in both the known and unknown breakpoint cases. The tests are applied to the conditional capital asset pricing model used by Harvey to explain the international variation in stock index returns. Harvey reported that data from five of the G7 countries satisfy the full-sample overidentifying restrictions of the model; our results indicate that all five of these models exhibit structural instability and so are misspecified.