跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以局部无混杂假设处理观察研究中的混杂并支持因果解释。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shih-Ni Prim
Yawen Guan
Shu Yang
Ana G Rappold
K. Lloyd Hill
Corinna Keeler
Brian J Reich

多暴露与多结局空间回归的谱混杂调整

研究问题
在多项环境暴露与健康结局具有空间依赖时,如何处理随空间尺度和变量配对变化的未观测混杂,并解释社会脆弱性效应?
方法与思路
作者用张量回归允许效应随暴露、结局和空间尺度变化,提取局部尺度效应,并以邻近地区差异无混杂支持因果解释。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法形成简洁可解释的多变量效应表示;美国南部应用中,经济韧性对糖尿病为正效应、对高脂血症为负效应。
阅读关注点
应核对局部无混杂假设的实质含义、谱尺度如何划分,以及局部效应提取、空间依赖处理和应用中的因果解释依据。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未获核实;因果解释依赖局部无混杂,摘要未说明其可检验性和估计不确定性。

原文摘要

Characterizing social vulnerability is fundamental to disaster response planning. Numerous vulnerability indicators have been developed, but they are typically not validated for their predictive power over the outcomes of interest. As with many environmental health studies where interventions are impractical or unethical, validation of social vulnerability against public health outcomes is observational and relies on spatially-dependent data. Observational studies are susceptible to bias induced by unmeasured confounders. This problem is exacerbated in spatial studies with multiple health outcomes and environmental exposure variables, as the source and magnitude of confounding bias may differ by spatial scale and across exposure/outcome pairs. We propose to mitigate confounding effects in multivariate spatial studies using a tensor-regression model that allows exposure effects to vary by exposure, outcome, and spatial scale. By extracting exposure effects that correspond to local spatial scales, we replace the strict causal assumption of no unmeasured confounders with a more realistic assumption of local unconfoundedness i.e., differences between nearby regions are unconfounded, allowing for causal interpretation. Our study of the Southern United States shows that economic resilience (Theme 1) demonstrates the strongest positive effect on diabetes and negative effect on hyperlipidemia. Our analysis reveals a concise representation of the effects of social vulnerability indices on an array of chronic health outcomes, offering interpretable epidemiological insights that adjust for multivariate spatial confounding.

笔记与分组