跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般假设检验的功效与两样本秩检验,没有所列经济计量应用方向的明确依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
W. Ehm
E. Mammen
D. W. Muller

近似线性检验的功效稳健化

研究问题
当备择变化不仅是分布位置平移,还包含形状改变时,如何增强线性或近似线性检验的功效并减少平移情形的损失?
方法与思路
作者结合位置的线性统计量与形状的二次统计量构造贝叶斯漏斗检验,先在高斯框架分析,再用于两样本非线性秩检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,漏斗检验具有特定区域上的最大最小性质,在形状变化时增加功效而对平移备择损失较小,并报告模拟支持。
阅读关注点
应核对贝叶斯构造、不变性要求、功效展开与旋转锥区域的定义,以及高斯近似转入有限样本时的条件和模拟设定。
阅读边界
依据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未量化功效收益与损失,最大最小性质也受指定区域限制,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

We present a general method of improving the power of linear and approximately linear tests when deviations from a translation family of distributions must be taken into account. This method involves the combination of a linear statistic measuring location and a quadratic statistic measuring change of shape of the underlying distribution. The tests (“funnel tests”) are constructed as certain Bayes tests. In general they gain a sizeable amount of power over the linear tests adapted to the translation family when a change of shape of the underlying distribution occurs, while losing little for translation alternatives (“power robustification”). We introduce the concept of funnel tests in an Gaussian framework first. The effect of power robustification is studied by means of a power function expansion, which applies to a large class of tests sharing a certain invariance property. The funnel tests are characterized by a maximin property over a region defined by a rotational cone. The idea of the construction is then carried over to a finite sample situation where the Gaussian model is used as an approximation. As a particular application, we construct power-robustified nonlinear rank tests in the standard two-sample situation. A simulation study demonstrates the good overall performance of these tests as compared to other nonlinear tests.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文