跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要比较观测与干预数据对结构方程因果方向识别和实验设计的作用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Valentinian Lungu
Anish Dhir
Mark van der Wilk

贝叶斯线性高斯因果模型中干预与观测样本的相对价值

研究问题
在双变量线性高斯因果发现中,观测与干预样本分别如何影响后验识别和收敛速度,怎样混合两类样本更有效?
方法与思路
作者分析异方差噪声结构方程模型的后验渐近行为,引入干预样本,并推导随观测样本占比变化的后验集中速率。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,纯观测数据无法一致识别相连图的方向;加入干预后,相连图出现指数收敛,并给出优化样本组合的条件。
阅读关注点
应核对先验及其推前分布、干预机制、样本比例的渐近设定,以及独立图与相连图速率差异和最优组合成立的条件。
阅读边界
所给版本为 arXiv 预印本,同行评审与期刊接收未核实;摘要未提供速率公式或最优条件,双变量结论不能直接推广。

原文摘要

We investigate the asymptotic properties of Bayesian bivariate causal discovery for Gaussian Linear Structural Equation Models (SEMs) with heteroscedastic noise. We demonstrate that with purely observational data, the posterior distribution over the models fails to consistently identify the true causal structure - a consequence of the fundamental non-identifiability within the Markov Equivalence Class. Specifically, if the true generating mechanism corresponds to a connected graph (A -> B or B -> A), the asymptotic behavior of the posterior is given by the ratio between the prior on the true model and the push-forward prior of the alternative. In contrast, for the independence model, we establish that the posterior concentrates at a stochastic polynomial rate of O_p(n^{-1/2}). To resolve this non-identifiability, we incorporate m interventional samples and characterize the concentration rates as a function of the observational-to-total sample ratio, η. We identify a sharp concentration dichotomy: while the independence graph maintains a polynomial O_p(N^{-1/2}) rate (where N = n+m), connected graphs undergo a phase transition to exponentially fast convergence. This highlights an exponential relative importance between the two data types, as altering the amount of one data type directly changes the exponent governing the concentration speed. We derive explicit formulae for the exponential decay rates and provide precise conditions under which mixing observational and interventional data optimizes concentration speed. Finally, our theoretical findings are validated through empirical simulations in Bayesian Gaussian equivalent (BGe)-style prior specifications offering a principled foundation for experimental design in Bayesian causal discovery.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文