跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:核心是通用序贯检验的证据合并,金融数据仅用于随机性检验,未明确对应所列金融细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yo Joong Choe
Aaditya Ramdas

跨滤过的信息证据合并

研究问题
针对同一复合原假设、但基于不同信息滤过构造的 e-process,如何合并而保持任意停止时点的推断有效性?
方法与思路
作者使用称为 adjuster 的函数,将 e-process 跨滤过提升,再进行证据合并,并研究此类调整函数的刻画。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,文章提出通用的先调整再合并程序,证明调整函数的必要性刻画,并指出恢复原滤过有效性存在对数代价。
阅读关注点
应核对滤过之间的关系、调整函数的有效条件、必要性采用的含义,以及对数代价如何度量和影响检验能力。
阅读边界
Crossref 摘要未给出调整函数形式和代价公式;金融数据随机性检验示例不能直接支持收益预测能力或投资结论。

原文摘要

Abstract In sequential anytime-valid inference, any admissible procedure must be based on e-processes: generalizations of test martingales that quantify the accumulated evidence against a composite null hypothesis at any stopping time. This paper proposes a method for combining e-processes constructed in different filtrations but for the same null. Although e-processes in the same filtration can be combined effortlessly (by averaging), e-processes in different filtrations cannot because their validity in a coarser filtration does not translate to a finer filtration. This issue arises in sequential tests of randomness and independence, as well as in the evaluation of sequential forecasters. We establish that a class of functions called adjusters can lift arbitrary e-processes across filtrations. The result yields a generally applicable ‘adjust-then-combine’ procedure, which we demonstrate on the problem of testing randomness in real-world financial data. Furthermore, we prove a characterization theorem for adjusters that formalizes a sense in which using adjusters is necessary. There are two major implications. First, if we have a powerful e-process in a coarsened filtration, then we readily have a powerful e-process in the original filtration. Second, when we coarsen the filtration to construct an e-process, there is a logarithmic cost to recovering validity in the original filtration.

笔记与分组