跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要重点是人口调查抽样与误差控制;提及失业指标和复合估计不足以支持宏观预测或面板方向分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Morris H. Hansen
William N. Hurwitz
Harold Nisselson
Joseph Steinberg

美国人口普查局当前人口调查的重新设计

研究问题
如何在家庭样本总量不变时改进当前人口调查的组织与估计效率,并处理新旧设计转换中部分指标出现差异和回答误差的问题?
方法与思路
摘要介绍1954年的调查重设计:样本覆盖地区由68增至230,引入复合估计与统计质量控制,并采取措施处理设计切换中的回答误差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,重设计降低多数估计量的抽样变异及方差估计的变异;部分指标尤其失业出现差异,采取措施后结果差异回到抽样误差范围内。
阅读关注点
应核对样本覆盖调整与复合估计的具体结构、效率比较基准,以及如何判断回答误差是主要困难,检查纠正措施及新旧设计的可比性。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明。摘要未提供效率增益数值或回答误差判定证据,历史调查调整不能代表当前设计,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In February 1954 a redesign of the Current Population Survey was introduced that provided for a more efficient system of field organization and supervision as well as some advances in methods. The sample is now spread over 230 areas instead of 68 areas with the same number of households as heretofore. A composite estimation procedure has been introduced which reduces the sampling variability for most estimates. Also, there has been a considerable reduction in the variance of variance estimates made from the sample. A statistical quality control program has been introduced to help insure results of consistently acceptable quality. Problems arose in the process of shifting from one design to the other that resulted in some significant differences between the new and old samples for a few of the estimates, especially unemployment. Apparently response errors were the principal source of difficulty, and it was possible to take steps to bring the results within sampling error range. Work on the measurement and control of response errors is being expanded.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文