跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究利用外部信息与过去观测的预测方法组合及平方误差风险界。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yuhong Yang

预测方法组合的若干理论结果

研究问题
组合多个连续变量预测方法时,能否保持最佳候选方法的收敛表现,并在潜在预测增益与权重估计复杂度之间取舍?
方法与思路
作者在平方误差损失及未来变量的条件分布假设下推导风险界,分析自动组合、线性组合和稀疏组合的收益与代价。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称组合风险受最佳候选风险的常数倍与附加惩罚控制,并可保持最佳收敛率;也指出无差别组合可能恶化表现。
阅读关注点
应核对条件分布假设、候选集规模、常数与惩罚项,以及自动组合何时利用稀疏性、何时仅保持最佳候选的速率。
阅读边界
仅据所给 RePEc 出版社摘要;风险界条件与实际增益数值未说明,速率保证不等于每次预测更准,也不能推断版本变化。

原文摘要

We study some methods of combining procedures for forecasting a continuous random variable. Statistical risk bounds under the square error loss are obtained under distributional assumptions on the future given the current outside information and the past observations. The risk bounds show that the combined forecast automatically achieves the best performance among the candidate procedures up to a constant factor and an additive penalty term. In terms of the rate of convergence, the combined forecast performs as well as if the best candidate forecasting procedure were known in advance.Empirical studies suggest that combining procedures can sometimes improve forecasting accuracy over the original procedures. Risk bounds are derived to theoretically quantify the potential gain and price of linearly combining forecasts for improvement. The result supports the empirical finding that it is not automatically a good idea to combine forecasts. Indiscriminate combining can degrade performance dramatically as a result of the large variability in estimating the best combining weights. An automated combining method is shown in theory to achieve a balance between the potential gain and the complexity penalty (the price of combining), to take advantage (if any) of sparse combining, and to maintain the best performance (in rate) among the candidate forecasting procedures if linear or sparse combining does not help.This research was supported by U.S. National Security Agency Grant MDA9049910060 and U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER Grant DMS0094323. The author sincerely thanks three reviewers and Poti Giannakouros for their very valuable comments, which led to a substantial improvement of the paper.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文