跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦混合类型数据的通用缺失值插补,使用面板调查资料不等于提出面板估计方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jared S. Murray
Jerome P. Reiter

通过具有局部依赖的贝叶斯混合模型多重插补分类与连续缺失值

研究问题
当调查数据同时含分类和连续变量且存在复杂依赖时,如何建立灵活的联合分布用于多重插补,并评估缺失处理对比较结论的影响?
方法与思路
作者融合多项分布与多元正态分布的 Dirichlet 过程混合,通过分类变量相关的分量均值和层级关联的混合概率表达跨类型依赖。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称收入调查应用中缺失处理改变了部分分布可比性结论;在所述重复抽样模拟中,插补表现通常优于默认链式方程方法。
阅读关注点
应核对缺失机制与联合模型假设、两类混合分量如何关联、插补不确定性如何传播,以及链式方程比较的默认设置和适用范围。
阅读边界
材料为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,无法核对刊本变化;摘要未说明缺失机制,比较优势限于所述模拟与默认链式方程实现。

原文摘要

We present a nonparametric Bayesian joint model for multivariate continuous and categorical variables, with the intention of developing a flexible engine for multiple imputation of missing values. The model fuses Dirichlet process mixtures of multinomial distributions for categorical variables with Dirichlet process mixtures of multivariate normal distributions for continuous variables. We incorporate dependence between the continuous and categorical variables by (1) modeling the means of the normal distributions as component-specific functions of the categorical variables and (2) forming distinct mixture components for the categorical and continuous data with probabilities that are linked via a hierarchical model. This structure allows the model to capture complex dependencies between the categorical and continuous data with minimal tuning by the analyst. We apply the model to impute missing values due to item nonresponse in an evaluation of the redesign of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). The goal is to compare estimates from a field test with the new design to estimates from selected individuals from a panel collected under the old design. We show that accounting for the missing data changes some conclusions about the comparability of the distributions in the two datasets. We also perform an extensive repeated sampling simulation using similar data from complete cases in an existing SIPP panel, comparing our proposed model to a default application of multiple imputation by chained equations. Imputations based on the proposed model tend to have better repeated sampling properties than the default application of chained equations in this realistic setting. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文