跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究列联表概率的通用收缩与风险理论,未提供所列经济领域细分的特定依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Arjun K. Gupta
Pranab K. Sen

利用独立结构改进列联表概率估计

研究问题
二维列联表可能具有独立结构但也可能偏离该结构时,如何在无约束、受约束、预检验与收缩估计之间权衡风险?
方法与思路
作者在独立性原假设和 Pitman 型局部备择下,研究四类单元格概率估计量的渐近分布、偏差及二次损失风险。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文比较了各估计量的渐近相对表现;预检验与收缩估计互不支配,但各自相对两类极大似然估计表现良好。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应核对预检验与 Stein 型收缩规则、局部备择的参数化,以及风险比较采用的损失函数与适用区域。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;结果依赖所述渐近风险框架,不能据此认定存在统一最优估计量。

原文摘要

Estimation of the cell probabilities in a two-way contingency table is considered when it is plausible that the table might have an independence structure relating to the two traits. In a classical nonparametric setup, the unrestricted maximum likelihood estimators of the cell probabilities are the corresponding sample proportions; under the assumption of independence, the restricted estimators are the product of the respective row and column sample proportions. The latter estimators behave better than the former when independence actually holds, but a different picture may emerge for possible departure from the assumed independence structure; the restricted estimators may be heavily biased, inefficient, and even inconsistent. For this reason, a preliminary test on independence based on the classical contingency chi-squared statistic may be conveniently incorporated in the formulation of a preliminary test estimator of the matrix of cell probabilities. Since, typically, we have a multiparameter estimation problem, a pretest or shrinkage estimator based on the classical Stein rule may also be formulated in the same vein. The primary objective of this article is to focus on the asymptotic distribution theory of all four estimators under the null hypothesis of independence as well as local Pitman-type alternatives. The bias and risk based on suitable quadratic loss functions of these estimators are considered in the same asymptotic setup, and these are then incorporated in the study of the asymptotic relative performance of these estimators. In the light of their asymptotic risks, neither the preliminary test nor the shrinkage estimators dominates the other, though each fares well relative to the unrestricted or the restricted maximum likelihood estimators.

笔记与分组